Mamdani Dems Dote on Intifada?

Letter to Ephesians: History teaches how the worst cowardly thugs gain power. Ask Robespierre, Lenin, Hitler or Mao. They encouraged fellow radicals to fall on their swords so THEIR blood would pave others’ way to the top. Wait. Isn’t THAT the script some Dem leaders are following?

GW Law Professor Jonathan Turley didn’t put it exactly THAT way in a recent post, but he did observe: “Democratic leaders are privately expressing alarm that their followers are demanding violence and rejecting moderate language. Yet, many are fueling that rage and few of their colleagues are speaking out against them ...” Coincidence? Or purposeful? How can you be “alarmed” at violent talk yet “fuel that rage”? And why would you not “speak out against” the calls for violence? You can’t. Ya gotta want it, just not be too obvious about it.

Consider as a possible example New York City Democratic Mayoral candidate Zohran whom Politico noted “declines to condemn” the radical pro-Islamic motto we’re hearing “Globalize the Intifada.” This, mind you, is a freaking MAYORAL candidate who cannot see his way to distancing himself from what many consider a call to revolution in the West, even though he may very well be meaning the term is more about obtaining “justice” for Islam. If the lesser, good for him. But, he’s not fooling anyone about letting the provocative language “energize” the angriest and intimidate the meekest among us, just so his profile keeps getting raised on HIS WAY TO THE TOP.

Davd Soul