Will “Clap Trap” Indict Brennan, Comey?

EX-CIA Dir Brennan’s Congressional testimony that doesn’t jive with his written communications & TV comments seems to be the smoking gun leading to his successor, John Radcliffe, referring it to DOJ for criminal investigation. Ex-FBI Director Comey next? Others?

The exclusive Fox News report was a blockbuster albeit limited so far to the one ex-spook. But columnist Greg Jarrett pointed out how “the CIA has belatedly exposed the rank corruption among top intelligence officials who connived to frame President Donald Trump & drive him from office during his first term.” Translated? Jarrett is suggesting Brennan naturally interacted repeatedly in meetings & exchanged communications with not only Comey, but ex-DNI James Clapper, both having also “testified” (quite obtusely) about Russian interference in 2016 presidential election. And if so, didn’t all three interact one way or another, including via meetings, with Obama and Hillary Clinton?

One can guess the slippery slope triggered by Radcliffe’s referral & Jarrett’s suggesting the obvious takeaway of a “conspiracy.” Readers will be frustrated by all this “suggesting,” but our legal system requiring “Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt,” may help explain why/how Justice can take so long & err on the side of too much caution. Wouldn’t it be ironic tho if that very lack of discretion may lead to the big mouths of Brennan, Comey & Clapper having to deal with an indictment?

Davd Soul