Hung Clancy Juror Had “No Doubts”

Letter to Romans: The lone holdout, a black man, debunks the character assassination allegations against him by defense counsel & other jurors? After he refused to let a “temporarily” psycho Lindsay Clancy off murder charges in the strangulation of her 3 young kids?

Is it unreasonable to ask whether this new evidence suggests misconduct by counsel & other hung up jurors bad enough for ethical or contempt of court (if not criminal) sanctions to be in order? Not that it will ever come to that thanks to the extreme MSM & social media outcry surrounding this case. Yet recall how Defense Lawyer Kevin (Red as in Blacklist) Reddington railed in open court as jury deliberations were still taking place over Michael P. Desronvil’s refusing to exonerate Clancy, who claimed “postpartum psychosis” and a “male voice” made her murder. Red was demonstrably furious in front of the cameras as he told the judge/viewers that Desronvil “repeatedly refused to follow the law.” How’d he know? One jury Q suggesting as much isn’t “proof.” Recall, too, other jurors telling reporters after the case was ruled hung that Desronvil had been acting “strange” & “refused” or “couldn’t” understand the meaning of “reasonable doubt.” Why? Because he didn’t agree with their “cause” aka “making things better for other women in the future.” After days of being vilified, Desronvil’s attorney, Edward Paltzik, told Fox News his client had to retreat to an undisclosed “rural” location to stay safe. The ex-Trump lawyer confirmed a statement from Desronvil insisting he “never wavered in his belief prosecutors proved Clancy knew what she was doing when she admitted strangling her kids. “I didn’t have any doubts,” Desronvil said. “As I tried to explain different possible theories during deliberations, I kept getting cut off as if I had doubts based on the evidence presented.”

Not only did Desronvil’s comments contradict Reddington’s & the “majority” jurors’ accounts but suggest possibly calculated attempts to intimidate the dissenting juror and/or future jurors should the case be retried. GW Law Prof. Turley has wondered whether all this open hostility & wrangling could make it near impossible to find another impartial jury. Meanwhile, the presiding Judge Sullivan has ordered the jurors identities & personal info sealed due to “safety concerns” … and Clancy’s 3 children are still inexplicably dead.

Davd Soul